AWTRIX 3 vs Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos
AWTRIX 3
Stephan Muehl
App Store
$59/mo
~$702/yr · 550 installs
VS
Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos
Jusbrasil
App Store
$2/mo
~$21/yr · 500 installs
Revenue winner
AWTRIX 3 wins
+2850% vs other
Installs winner
AWTRIX 3 wins
+10% vs other
MAU winner
Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos wins
+11% vs other
Rating winner
Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos wins
+16% vs other
Why AWTRIX 3 is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- AWTRIX 3 earns roughly 30× more per month than Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos - $59 vs $2.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full AWTRIX 3 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$59
◀
$2
Annual revenue (est.)
$702
◀
$21
Lifetime installs (est.)
550
◀
500
Monthly active users (est.)?
49.5
▶
55
App Store rating
3.18★
▶
3.70★
Total ratings
11
◀
10
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$0.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- USD3.99
- Released
- Aug 22, 2023
- Last updated
- Jan 5, 2025
- File size
- 8.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.22
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 10, 2020
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 50.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.114.0
- Languages
- English
AWTRIX 3 trajectory
Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AWTRIX 3 or Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos? v
AWTRIX 3 earns about $59 per month, while Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos earns about $2. That is a 29.5× revenue gap (~$57 more per month for AWTRIX 3). Annual revenue: AWTRIX 3 ≈ $702/year, Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos ≈ $21/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AWTRIX 3 or Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos? v
AWTRIX 3 leads with about 550 estimated downloads vs 500 for Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos - a 1.1× gap. AWTRIX 3's App Store downloads are estimated from 11 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos's App Store downloads are estimated from 10 ratings.
Are AWTRIX 3 and Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AWTRIX 3 and Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos offer? v
AWTRIX 3: no IAP detected on the public listing. Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos: IAP range 2 tiers detected. AWTRIX 3 runs a "Paid app ($3.99)" monetization model; Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos runs "Subscription (~$0.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AWTRIX 3 or Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos? v
Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos edges ahead with ★ 3.7 vs ★ 3.2 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: AWTRIX 3 11 ratings, Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos 10 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AWTRIX 3 vs Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $59 for AWTRIX 3 and $2 for Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AWTRIX 3 or Jusbrasil: Consultar Processos to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
