Baby Feeding Log vs Squeezy
Baby Feeding Log
Aron Beaver
App Store
$16.3K/mo
~$196.2K/yr · 231K installs
VS
Squeezy
Living With Ltd
App Store
$1.6K/mo
~$19.7K/yr · 12K installs
Revenue winner
Baby Feeding Log wins
+895% vs other
Installs winner
Baby Feeding Log wins
+1771% vs other
MAU winner
Baby Feeding Log wins
+1497% vs other
Rating winner
Baby Feeding Log wins
+1% vs other
Why Baby Feeding Log is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Baby Feeding Log earns roughly 10× more per month than Squeezy - $16.3K vs $1.6K.
- Bigger install base. Baby Feeding Log has ~231K lifetime installs vs Squeezy's ~12K - 18.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Baby Feeding Log report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Baby Feeding Log
vs
Squeezy
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$16.3K
◀
$1.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$196.2K
◀
$19.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
231K
◀
12K
Monthly active users (est.)?
51K
◀
3K
App Store rating
4.82★
◀
4.79★
Total ratings
3K
◀
247
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Medical
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 1, 2011
- Last updated
- Jul 25, 2024
- File size
- 7.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.716
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese +3 more
- Category
- Medical
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- Oct 14, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 41.6 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 10.1.4
- Languages
- English, Polish
Baby Feeding Log trajectory
Squeezy trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Baby Feeding Log or Squeezy? v
Baby Feeding Log earns about $16.3K per month, while Squeezy earns about $1.6K. That is a 10.0× revenue gap (~$14.7K more per month for Baby Feeding Log). Annual revenue: Baby Feeding Log ≈ $196.2K/year, Squeezy ≈ $19.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Baby Feeding Log or Squeezy? v
Baby Feeding Log leads with about 231K estimated downloads vs 12K for Squeezy - a 18.7× gap. Baby Feeding Log's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Squeezy's App Store downloads are estimated from 247 ratings.
Are Baby Feeding Log and Squeezy in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Medical category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Baby Feeding Log and Squeezy offer? v
Baby Feeding Log: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Squeezy: no IAP detected on the public listing. Baby Feeding Log runs a "Free + one-time IAP (1 tiers)" monetization model; Squeezy runs "Paid app ($4.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Baby Feeding Log or Squeezy? v
Baby Feeding Log edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Baby Feeding Log 3K ratings, Squeezy 247 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Baby Feeding Log vs Squeezy revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $16.3K for Baby Feeding Log and $1.6K for Squeezy are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Medical) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Baby Feeding Log or Squeezy to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.