Baby Shark World for Kids vs Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor
Baby Shark World for Kids
The Pinkfong Company
Google Play
$100.5K/mo
~$1.21M/yr · 4.4M installs
VS
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor
Lightricks Ltd.
Google Play
$3.27M/mo
~$39.27M/yr · 89.5M installs
Revenue winner
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor wins
+3156% vs other
Installs winner
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor wins
+1923% vs other
MAU winner
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor wins
+3383% vs other
Rating winner
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor wins
+26% vs other
Why Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor earns roughly 33× more per month than Baby Shark World for Kids - $3.27M vs $100.5K.
- Aggressive pricing. Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor undercuts at $14.07/mo vs $31.14/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor has ~89.5M lifetime installs vs Baby Shark World for Kids's ~4.4M - 20.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor sits at 4.40★ vs 3.49★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Baby Shark World for Kids
vs
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$100.5K
▶
$3.27M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.21M
▶
$39.27M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.4M
▶
89.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
239K
▶
8.3M
App Store rating
3.49★
▶
4.40★
Total ratings
2K
▶
812K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$31.14
◀
$14.07
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Education
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 6, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.07
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 21, 2018
- Last updated
- Dec 14, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.58.0-free
- Languages
- -
Baby Shark World for Kids trajectory
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Baby Shark World for Kids or Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor? v
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor earns about $3.27M per month, while Baby Shark World for Kids earns about $100.5K. That is a 32.6× revenue gap (~$3.17M more per month for Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor). Annual revenue: Baby Shark World for Kids ≈ $1.21M/year, Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor ≈ $39.27M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Baby Shark World for Kids or Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor? v
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor leads with about 89.5M estimated downloads vs 4.4M for Baby Shark World for Kids - a 20.2× gap. Baby Shark World for Kids reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Baby Shark World for Kids and Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
No - Baby Shark World for Kids is in Education and Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor is in Photography. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: Baby Shark World for Kids from education monetization patterns, Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor from photography.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Baby Shark World for Kids and Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor offer? v
Baby Shark World for Kids: IAP range $8.99 - $107.88 per item. Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor: IAP range $0.99 - $199.99 per item. Baby Shark World for Kids runs a "Subscription (~$31.14/mo)" monetization model; Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor runs "Subscription (~$14.07/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Baby Shark World for Kids or Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor? v
Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Baby Shark World for Kids 67 ratings, Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor 13K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Baby Shark World for Kids vs Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $100.5K for Baby Shark World for Kids and $3.27M for Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education / Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Baby Shark World for Kids or Facetune: Hair, Photo Editor to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.