baby.skills vs Intake: Calorie Log
baby.skills
baby.skills
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
Intake: Calorie Log
Tobias Bechtold
Google Play
$76/mo
~$914/yr · 978 installs
Revenue winner
Intake: Calorie Log wins
+7600% vs other
Installs winner
Intake: Calorie Log wins
+97800% vs other
MAU winner
Intake: Calorie Log wins
+23961% vs other
Rating winnerTied
Why Intake: Calorie Log is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Intake: Calorie Log earns roughly 76× more per month than baby.skills - $76 vs $0.
- Premium pricing. Intake: Calorie Log charges $11.67/mo vs baby.skills's $1.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Intake: Calorie Log has ~978 lifetime installs vs baby.skills's ~0 - 978.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Intake: Calorie Log report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
baby.skills
vs
Intake: Calorie Log
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$76
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$914
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
978
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
239.61
App Store rating
-
=
-
Total ratings
0
=
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.99
▶
$11.67
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 9, 2024
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 2025
- File size
- 44.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.6.7
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD6.49
- Released
- Mar 3, 2026
- Last updated
- Jul 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.4.3
- Languages
- -
baby.skills trajectory
Intake: Calorie Log trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, baby.skills or Intake: Calorie Log? v
Intake: Calorie Log earns about $76 per month, while baby.skills earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$76 more per month for Intake: Calorie Log). Annual revenue: baby.skills ≈ $0/year, Intake: Calorie Log ≈ $914/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, baby.skills or Intake: Calorie Log? v
Intake: Calorie Log leads with about 978 estimated downloads vs 0 for baby.skills - a ∞× gap. baby.skills's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Intake: Calorie Log reports 500+ installs on Google Play.
Are baby.skills and Intake: Calorie Log in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do baby.skills and Intake: Calorie Log offer? v
baby.skills: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Intake: Calorie Log: IAP range $3.49 - $38.99 per item. baby.skills runs a "Subscription (~$1.99/mo)" monetization model; Intake: Calorie Log runs "Paid app ($6.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
How accurate are these baby.skills vs Intake: Calorie Log revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for baby.skills and $76 for Intake: Calorie Log are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare baby.skills or Intake: Calorie Log to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.