Balatro vs Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game
Balatro
Playstack
Google Play
$197.2K/mo
~$2.37M/yr · 1.6M installs
VS
Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game
The Pokémon Company
Google Play
$39.8K/mo
~$477.7K/yr · 63.1M installs
Revenue winner
Balatro wins
+395% vs other
Installs winner
Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game wins
+3735% vs other
MAU winner
Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game wins
+2585% vs other
Rating winner
Balatro wins
+3% vs other
Why Balatro is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Balatro earns roughly 5× more per month than Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game - $197.2K vs $39.8K.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Balatro report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Balatro
vs
Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$197.2K
◀
$39.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.37M
◀
$477.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.6M
▶
63.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
82K
▶
2.2M
App Store rating
4.70★
◀
4.54★
Total ratings
25K
▶
1.7M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.95
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Card
- Price
- USD9.99
- Released
- Sep 24, 2024
- Last updated
- Mar 19, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 0.7
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Card
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 22, 2024
- Last updated
- Mar 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.6.0
- Languages
- -
Balatro trajectory
Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Balatro or Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game? v
Balatro earns about $197.2K per month, while Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game earns about $39.8K. That is a 5.0× revenue gap (~$157.4K more per month for Balatro). Annual revenue: Balatro ≈ $2.37M/year, Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game ≈ $477.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Balatro or Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game? v
Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game leads with about 63.1M estimated downloads vs 1.6M for Balatro - a 38.4× gap. Balatro reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Balatro and Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Card category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Balatro and Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game offer? v
Balatro: no IAP detected on the public listing. Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game: IAP range $0.99 - $99.99 per item. Balatro runs a "Paid app ($9.99)" monetization model; Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game runs "Free casual game · ad-supported (~$0.04/MAU)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Balatro or Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game? v
Balatro edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Balatro 3K ratings, Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game 38K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Balatro vs Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $197.2K for Balatro and $39.8K for Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Card) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Balatro or Pokémon TCG Pocket - Card Game to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.