Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet vs EDEKA

Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet earns about $1 per month, while EDEKA earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$1 more per month for Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet). Annual revenue: Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet ≈ $16/year, EDEKA ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

EDEKA leads with about 9.7M estimated downloads vs 84 for Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet - a 115129.7× gap. Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet reports 50+ installs on Google Play. EDEKA reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet: IAP range $9.99 per item. EDEKA: no IAP detected on the public listing. Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet runs a "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)" monetization model; EDEKA runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

EDEKA edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.2 stars). Rating volume: Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet 0 ratings, EDEKA 13 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1 for Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet and $0 for EDEKA are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.