Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet vs Slow Cooker Central
Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet
Kevin Ton
Google Play
$1/mo
~$16/yr · 84 installs
VS
Slow Cooker Central
Slow Cooker Central Pty Ltd
Google Play
$66/mo
~$789/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
Slow Cooker Central wins
+6500% vs other
Installs winner
Slow Cooker Central wins
+1769% vs other
MAU winner
Slow Cooker Central wins
+1485% vs other
Rating winnerTied
Why Slow Cooker Central is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Slow Cooker Central earns roughly 66× more per month than Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet - $66 vs $1.
- Bigger install base. Slow Cooker Central has ~2K lifetime installs vs Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet's ~84 - 18.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Slow Cooker Central report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet
vs
Slow Cooker Central
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1
▶
$66
Annual revenue (est.)
$16
▶
$789
Lifetime installs (est.)
84
▶
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
9.408
▶
149.15
App Store rating
-
=
-
Total ratings
0
=
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 22, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.3.3.13
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD3.49
- Released
- May 29, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 14, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Languages
- -
Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet trajectory
Slow Cooker Central trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet or Slow Cooker Central? v
Slow Cooker Central earns about $66 per month, while Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet earns about $1. That is a 66.0× revenue gap (~$65 more per month for Slow Cooker Central). Annual revenue: Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet ≈ $16/year, Slow Cooker Central ≈ $789/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet or Slow Cooker Central? v
Slow Cooker Central leads with about 2K estimated downloads vs 84 for Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet - a 18.7× gap. Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet reports 50+ installs on Google Play. Slow Cooker Central reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet and Slow Cooker Central in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet and Slow Cooker Central offer? v
Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet: IAP range $9.99 per item. Slow Cooker Central: no IAP detected on the public listing. Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet runs a "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)" monetization model; Slow Cooker Central runs "Paid app ($3.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
How accurate are these Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet vs Slow Cooker Central revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1 for Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet and $66 for Slow Cooker Central are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Bariatric Gastric Sleeve Diet or Slow Cooker Central to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.