Bartender School vs Plan to Eat
Bartender School
Henrique Bersani
App Store
$3.6K/mo
~$43.5K/yr · 95K installs
VS
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.8K/yr · 475K installs
Revenue winner
Plan to Eat wins
+132% vs other
Installs winner
Plan to Eat wins
+402% vs other
MAU winner
Plan to Eat wins
+402% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+1% vs other
Why Plan to Eat is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Plan to Eat earns roughly 2× more per month than Bartender School - $8.4K vs $3.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. Plan to Eat undercuts at $4.58/mo vs $9.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Plan to Eat has ~475K lifetime installs vs Bartender School's ~95K - 5.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Plan to Eat report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Bartender School
vs
Plan to Eat
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.6K
▶
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$43.5K
▶
$100.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
95K
▶
475K
Monthly active users (est.)?
11K
▶
57K
App Store rating
4.77★
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
1K
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 6, 2018
- Last updated
- Apr 7, 2026
- File size
- 164.3 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 6.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
Bartender School trajectory
Plan to Eat trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Bartender School or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K per month, while Bartender School earns about $3.6K. That is a 2.3× revenue gap (~$4.8K more per month for Plan to Eat). Annual revenue: Bartender School ≈ $43.5K/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $100.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Bartender School or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat leads with about 475K estimated downloads vs 95K for Bartender School - a 5.0× gap. Bartender School's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Bartender School and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Bartender School and Plan to Eat offer? v
Bartender School: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Bartender School runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Bartender School or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Bartender School 1K ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Bartender School vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.6K for Bartender School and $8.4K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Bartender School or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.