Basic-Fit vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Basic-Fit
Basic-Fit
Google Play
$457.9K/mo
~$5.49M/yr · 5.9M installs
VS
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
$415.8K/mo
~$4.99M/yr · 4.0M installs
Revenue winner
Basic-Fit wins
+10% vs other
Installs winner
Basic-Fit wins
+47% vs other
MAU winner
Basic-Fit wins
+40% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+16% vs other
Why Basic-Fit is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. Basic-Fit undercuts at $12.00/mo vs $24.48/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Basic-Fit report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Basic-Fit
vs
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$457.9K
◀
$415.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.49M
◀
$4.99M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.9M
◀
4.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
802K
◀
574K
App Store rating
4.00★
▶
4.64★
Total ratings
37K
▶
264K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.00
▶
$24.48
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 6, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.91.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2024
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.231
- Languages
- -
Basic-Fit trajectory
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Basic-Fit or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Basic-Fit earns about $457.9K per month, while Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns about $415.8K. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$42.1K more per month for Basic-Fit). Annual revenue: Basic-Fit ≈ $5.49M/year, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $4.99M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Basic-Fit or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Basic-Fit leads with about 5.9M estimated downloads vs 4.0M for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker - a 1.5× gap. Basic-Fit reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Basic-Fit and Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Basic-Fit and Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker offer? v
Basic-Fit: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. Basic-Fit runs a "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$24.48/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Basic-Fit or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Basic-Fit 3 ratings, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Basic-Fit vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $457.9K for Basic-Fit and $415.8K for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Basic-Fit or Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.