Basic-Fit vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker

Basic-Fit

Basic-Fit
App Store
$1.4K/mo
~$16.6K/yr · 4K installs
VS

Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker

Lifesum
Google Play
$1.63M/mo
~$19.62M/yr · 29.4M installs
Revenue winner Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins +118026% vs other
Installs winner Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins +775840% vs other
MAU winner Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins +228910% vs other
Rating winner Basic-Fit wins +6% vs other

Why Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 1181× more per month than Basic-Fit - $1.63M vs $1.4K.
  2. Premium pricing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker charges $19.97/mo vs Basic-Fit's $12.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker has ~29.4M lifetime installs vs Basic-Fit's ~4K - 7759.4× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Basic-Fit
vs
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.4K
$1.63M
Annual revenue (est.)
$16.6K
$19.62M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4K
29.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
2.5M
App Store rating
4.64★
4.40★
Total ratings
138
376K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.00
$19.97
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Basic-Fit

Basic-Fit
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 6, 2025
Last updated
Jun 30, 2026
File size
63.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.95.1
Languages
Dutch, English, French, German, Spanish
View full Basic-Fit report →

Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker

Lifesum
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 16, 2011
Last updated
Jun 17, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker report →

Basic-Fit trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Basic-Fit or Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $1.63M per month, while Basic-Fit earns about $1.4K. That is a 1181.3× revenue gap (~$1.63M more per month for Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Basic-Fit ≈ $16.6K/year, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $19.62M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Basic-Fit or Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 29.4M estimated downloads vs 4K for Basic-Fit - a 7759.4× gap. Basic-Fit's App Store downloads are estimated from 138 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Basic-Fit and Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Basic-Fit and Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Basic-Fit: no IAP detected on the public listing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $3.99 - $99.99 per item. Basic-Fit runs a "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$19.97/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Basic-Fit or Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Basic-Fit edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Basic-Fit 138 ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker 14K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Basic-Fit vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.4K for Basic-Fit and $1.63M for Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Basic-Fit or Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.