Basic-Fit vs MActivePro
Basic-Fit
Basic-Fit
App Store
$1.4K/mo
~$16.3K/yr · 4K installs
VS
MActivePro
Shenzhen Horn Big Data Software Co.,Ltd
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 10.5M installs
Revenue winner
Basic-Fit wins
+136200% vs other
Installs winner
MActivePro wins
+279471% vs other
MAU winner
MActivePro wins
+67851% vs other
Rating winner
Basic-Fit wins
+37% vs other
Why Basic-Fit is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Basic-Fit earns roughly 1362× more per month than MActivePro - $1.4K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Basic-Fit runs a $12.00/mo subscription that compounds; MActivePro relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. Basic-Fit sits at 4.63★ vs 3.38★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Basic-Fit report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Basic-Fit
vs
MActivePro
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.4K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$16.3K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
4K
▶
10.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
732K
App Store rating
4.63★
◀
3.38★
Total ratings
136
▶
27K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.00
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 6, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 63.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.95.0
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Spanish
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 28, 2021
- Last updated
- Jun 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.9.8
- Languages
- -
Basic-Fit trajectory
MActivePro trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Basic-Fit or MActivePro? v
Basic-Fit earns about $1.4K per month, while MActivePro earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$1.4K more per month for Basic-Fit). Annual revenue: Basic-Fit ≈ $16.3K/year, MActivePro ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Basic-Fit or MActivePro? v
MActivePro leads with about 10.5M estimated downloads vs 4K for Basic-Fit - a 2795.7× gap. Basic-Fit's App Store downloads are estimated from 136 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MActivePro reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Basic-Fit and MActivePro in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Basic-Fit and MActivePro have in-app purchases? v
Basic-Fit does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. MActivePro does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Basic-Fit runs "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)", MActivePro runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Basic-Fit or MActivePro? v
Basic-Fit edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.4 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Basic-Fit 136 ratings, MActivePro 150 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Basic-Fit vs MActivePro revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.4K for Basic-Fit and $0 for MActivePro are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Basic-Fit or MActivePro to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.