Baskin-Robbins vs Dairy Queen® Food & Treats

Dairy Queen® Food & Treats earns about $0 per month, while Baskin-Robbins earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Baskin-Robbins ≈ $0/year, Dairy Queen® Food & Treats ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Dairy Queen® Food & Treats leads with about 11.5M estimated downloads vs 2.0M for Baskin-Robbins - a 5.8× gap. Baskin-Robbins reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Dairy Queen® Food & Treats reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Baskin-Robbins does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Dairy Queen® Food & Treats does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Baskin-Robbins runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Dairy Queen® Food & Treats runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

Dairy Queen® Food & Treats edges ahead with ★ 4.2 vs ★ 3.4 (gap of 0.8 stars). Rating volume: Baskin-Robbins 2K ratings, Dairy Queen® Food & Treats 14K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Baskin-Robbins and $0 for Dairy Queen® Food & Treats are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.