BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor vs Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor
Meitu (China) Limited
Google Play
$3.51M/mo
~$42.06M/yr · 99.8M installs
VS
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video
PicsArt, Inc.
Google Play
$23.53M/mo
~$282.40M/yr · 1.4B installs
Revenue winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+571% vs other
Installs winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+1308% vs other
MAU winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+469% vs other
Rating winner
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video wins
+4% vs other
Why Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video earns roughly 7× more per month than BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor - $23.53M vs $3.51M.
- Premium pricing. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video charges $14.76/mo vs BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor's $5.64/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video has ~1.4B lifetime installs vs BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor's ~99.8M - 14.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.51M
▶
$23.53M
Annual revenue (est.)
$42.06M
▶
$282.40M
Lifetime installs (est.)
99.8M
▶
1.4B
Monthly active users (est.)?
8.9M
▶
50.6M
App Store rating
3.86★
▶
4.03★
Total ratings
473K
▶
12.2M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$5.64
▶
$14.76
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 25, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 13.1.35
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 4, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 29.8.8
- Languages
- -
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor trajectory
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video earns about $23.53M per month, while BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor earns about $3.51M. That is a 6.7× revenue gap (~$20.03M more per month for Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video). Annual revenue: BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor ≈ $42.06M/year, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video ≈ $282.40M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video leads with about 1.4B estimated downloads vs 99.8M for BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor - a 14.1× gap. BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video reports 1,000,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor and Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor and Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video offer? v
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor: IAP range $0.49 - $64.99 per item. Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video: IAP range $0.99 - $219.99 per item. BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor runs a "Subscription (~$5.64/mo)" monetization model; Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video runs "Subscription (~$14.76/mo, ai)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video? v
Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video edges ahead with ★ 4.0 vs ★ 3.9 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor 3K ratings, Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video 445K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor vs Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.51M for BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor and $23.53M for Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor or Picsart AI Photo Editor, Video to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
