BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor
Xiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd.
App Store
$285.6K/mo
~$3.43M/yr · 2.3M installs
VS
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Spark Dynamic
App Store
$174.0K/mo
~$2.09M/yr · 1.8M installs
Revenue winner
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor wins
+64% vs other
Installs winner
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor wins
+33% vs other
MAU winner
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor wins
+37% vs other
Rating winner
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor wins
+10% vs other
Why BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor earns roughly 2× more per month than Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - $285.6K vs $174.0K.
- Premium pricing. BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor charges $11.99/mo vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- More monetization surfaces. BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor runs 7 IAP tiers vs 3 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor sits at 4.77★ vs 4.35★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor
vs
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$285.6K
◀
$174.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.43M
◀
$2.09M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.3M
◀
1.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
736K
◀
539K
App Store rating
4.77★
◀
4.35★
Total ratings
21K
◀
16K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
3 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 27, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- 511.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 13.1.40
- Languages
- English, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Chinese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 7, 2023
- Last updated
- Apr 21, 2026
- File size
- 108.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.8.3
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor trajectory
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor or Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters? v
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor earns about $285.6K per month, while Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $174.0K. That is a 1.6× revenue gap (~$111.6K more per month for BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor). Annual revenue: BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor ≈ $3.43M/year, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $2.09M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor or Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters? v
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor leads with about 2.3M estimated downloads vs 1.8M for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - a 1.3× gap. BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 21K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings.
Are BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor and Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor and Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters offer? v
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: IAP range 3 tiers detected. BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor runs a "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)" monetization model; Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor or Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters? v
BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor 21K ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $285.6K for BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor and $174.0K for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BeautyCam-AI Photo Editor or Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.