BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor vs FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor
Xiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.4M installs
VS
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer
FUJIFILM Corporation
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 800 installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor wins
+296804% vs other
MAU winner
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor wins
+363292% vs other
Rating winner
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor wins
+118% vs other
Why BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor has ~2.4M lifetime installs vs FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer's ~800 - 2969.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor sits at 4.76★ vs 2.19★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor
vs
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.4M
◀
800
Monthly active users (est.)?
753K
◀
207.2
App Store rating
4.76★
◀
2.19★
Total ratings
22K
◀
16
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 27, 2013
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 540.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 13.2.30
- Languages
- English, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Chinese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 12, 2015
- Last updated
- Mar 4, 2026
- File size
- 9.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.3.13
- Languages
- English, Japanese
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor trajectory
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor or FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer? v
FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer earns about $0 per month, while BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor ≈ $0/year, FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor or FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer? v
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor leads with about 2.4M estimated downloads vs 800 for FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer - a 2969.0× gap. BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 22K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer's App Store downloads are estimated from 16 ratings.
Are BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor and FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor and FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer have in-app purchases? v
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor or FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer? v
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 2.2 (gap of 2.6 stars). Rating volume: BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor 22K ratings, FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer 16 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor vs FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor and $0 for FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor or FUJIFILM WPS Photo Transfer to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.