BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor vs GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor
Xiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd.
App Store
$290.7K/mo
~$3.49M/yr · 2.4M installs
VS
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam
Noahproject Inc.
App Store
$11/mo
~$127/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor wins
+2642800% vs other
Installs winner
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor wins
+591178% vs other
MAU winner
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor wins
+580194% vs other
Rating winner
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam wins
+5% vs other
Why BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor earns roughly 26429× more per month than GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam - $290.7K vs $11.
- Subscription model. BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor runs a $11.99/mo subscription that compounds; GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor has ~2.4M lifetime installs vs GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam's ~400 - 5912.8× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$290.7K
◀
$11
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.49M
◀
$127
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.4M
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
750K
◀
129.2
App Store rating
4.77★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
22K
◀
6
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 27, 2013
- Last updated
- Jun 21, 2026
- File size
- 540.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 13.2.20
- Languages
- English, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Chinese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Dec 1, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 18, 2026
- File size
- 59.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.4.0
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Chinese
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor trajectory
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor or GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam? v
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor earns about $290.7K per month, while GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam earns about $11. That is a 26429.0× revenue gap (~$290.7K more per month for BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor). Annual revenue: BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor ≈ $3.49M/year, GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam ≈ $127/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor or GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam? v
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor leads with about 2.4M estimated downloads vs 400 for GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam - a 5912.8× gap. BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 22K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam's App Store downloads are estimated from 6 ratings.
Are BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor and GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor and GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam offer? v
BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor: IAP range 7 tiers detected. GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam: no IAP detected on the public listing. BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor runs a "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)" monetization model; GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam runs "Paid app ($0.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor or GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam? v
GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor 22K ratings, GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor vs GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $290.7K for BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor and $11 for GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BeautyCam-Digicam&Photo Editor or GIKA - Vintage Phone Cam to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
