Bed and Bale vs GPS Photo: With Location & Map

Bed and Bale

Bed and Bale Horse Travel App
Google Play
$265/mo
~$3.2K/yr · 9K installs
VS

GPS Photo: With Location & Map

Galaxy studio apps
Google Play
$262.7K/mo
~$3.15M/yr · 21.1M installs
Revenue winner GPS Photo: With Location & Map wins +99044% vs other
Installs winner GPS Photo: With Location & Map wins +235237% vs other
MAU winner GPS Photo: With Location & Map wins +94035% vs other
Rating winner GPS Photo: With Location & Map wins +68% vs other

Why GPS Photo: With Location & Map is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. GPS Photo: With Location & Map earns roughly 991× more per month than Bed and Bale - $262.7K vs $265.
  2. Premium pricing. GPS Photo: With Location & Map charges $9.95/mo vs Bed and Bale's $7.03/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. GPS Photo: With Location & Map has ~21.1M lifetime installs vs Bed and Bale's ~9K - 2353.4× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. GPS Photo: With Location & Map sits at 4.10★ vs 2.43★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full GPS Photo: With Location & Map report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Bed and Bale
vs
GPS Photo: With Location & Map
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$265
▶
$262.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.2K
▶
$3.15M
Lifetime installs (est.)
9K
▶
21.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
1.1M
App Store rating
2.43★
▶
4.10★
Total ratings
40
▶
98K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$7.03
▶
$9.95
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Bed and Bale

Bed and Bale Horse Travel App
Google Play
Category
Travel & Local
Price
Free
Released
Jan 11, 2019
Last updated
Dec 24, 2024
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.0.0
Languages
-
View full Bed and Bale report →

GPS Photo: With Location & Map

Galaxy studio apps
Google Play
Category
Travel & Local
Price
Free
Released
Dec 26, 2018
Last updated
Dec 15, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.2.0
Languages
-
View full GPS Photo: With Location & Map report →

Bed and Bale trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

GPS Photo: With Location & Map trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Bed and Bale Play Store page →GPS Photo: With Location & Map Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Bed and Bale Android vs Hotelscombined Travel Deals AndroidBed and Bale Android vs Packpoint Premium Packing List AndroidAmerican Airlines Android vs Bed and Bale AndroidBed and Bale Android vs Disneyland AndroidBed and Bale Android vs Track Any Phone AndroidBed and Bale Android vs Easypark Parking Made Easy Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Bed and Bale or GPS Photo: With Location & Map? v
GPS Photo: With Location & Map earns about $262.7K per month, while Bed and Bale earns about $265. That is a 991.4× revenue gap (~$262.5K more per month for GPS Photo: With Location & Map). Annual revenue: Bed and Bale ≈ $3.2K/year, GPS Photo: With Location & Map ≈ $3.15M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Bed and Bale or GPS Photo: With Location & Map? v
GPS Photo: With Location & Map leads with about 21.1M estimated downloads vs 9K for Bed and Bale - a 2353.4× gap. Bed and Bale reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play. GPS Photo: With Location & Map reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Bed and Bale and GPS Photo: With Location & Map in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Bed and Bale and GPS Photo: With Location & Map offer? v
Bed and Bale: IAP range $0.99 - $49.99 per item. GPS Photo: With Location & Map: IAP range $0.99 - $99.99 per item. Bed and Bale runs a "Subscription (~$7.03/mo)" monetization model; GPS Photo: With Location & Map runs "Subscription (~$9.95/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Bed and Bale or GPS Photo: With Location & Map? v
GPS Photo: With Location & Map edges ahead with ★ 4.1 vs ★ 2.4 (gap of 1.7 stars). Rating volume: Bed and Bale 18 ratings, GPS Photo: With Location & Map 112 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Bed and Bale vs GPS Photo: With Location & Map revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $265 for Bed and Bale and $262.7K for GPS Photo: With Location & Map are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Bed and Bale or GPS Photo: With Location & Map to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.