been vs Flight Tracker Airplane Radar
been
VINCI APPS
App Store
$5.7K/mo
~$67.9K/yr · 577K installs
VS
Flight Tracker Airplane Radar
CODINYX LTD
App Store
$5.0K/mo
~$60.2K/yr · 142K installs
Revenue winner
been wins
+13% vs other
Installs winner
been wins
+307% vs other
MAU winner
been wins
+304% vs other
Rating winner
Flight Tracker Airplane Radar wins
+1% vs other
Why been is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. been undercuts at $1.67/mo vs $5.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. been has ~577K lifetime installs vs Flight Tracker Airplane Radar's ~142K - 4.1× the funnel top.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.7K
◀
$5.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$67.9K
◀
$60.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
577K
◀
142K
Monthly active users (est.)?
105K
◀
26K
App Store rating
4.69★
▶
4.75★
Total ratings
7K
◀
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.67
▶
$5.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
=
3 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 30, 2013
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 193.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.10.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 29, 2023
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 135.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.6
- Languages
- Arabic, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch +27 more
been trajectory
Flight Tracker Airplane Radar trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, been or Flight Tracker Airplane Radar? v
been earns about $5.7K per month, while Flight Tracker Airplane Radar earns about $5.0K. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$635 more per month for been). Annual revenue: been ≈ $67.9K/year, Flight Tracker Airplane Radar ≈ $60.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, been or Flight Tracker Airplane Radar? v
been leads with about 577K estimated downloads vs 142K for Flight Tracker Airplane Radar - a 4.1× gap. been's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Flight Tracker Airplane Radar's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings.
Are been and Flight Tracker Airplane Radar in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do been and Flight Tracker Airplane Radar offer? v
been: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Flight Tracker Airplane Radar: IAP range 3 tiers detected. been runs a "Subscription (~$1.67/mo)" monetization model; Flight Tracker Airplane Radar runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, been or Flight Tracker Airplane Radar? v
Flight Tracker Airplane Radar edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: been 7K ratings, Flight Tracker Airplane Radar 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these been vs Flight Tracker Airplane Radar revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.7K for been and $5.0K for Flight Tracker Airplane Radar are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare been or Flight Tracker Airplane Radar to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
