Before/After: Photo Compare vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera

Before/After: Photo Compare

Fancygames, Ltd.
App Store
$1.1K/mo
~$12.8K/yr · 10K installs
VS

Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera

DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.64M/mo
~$19.73M/yr · 16.5M installs
Revenue winner Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins +154121% vs other
Installs winner Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins +172389% vs other
MAU winner Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins +154232% vs other
Rating winner Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins +4% vs other

Why Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns roughly 1542× more per month than Before/After: Photo Compare - $1.64M vs $1.1K.
  2. Premium pricing. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera charges $12.99/mo vs Before/After: Photo Compare's $12.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera has ~16.5M lifetime installs vs Before/After: Photo Compare's ~10K - 1724.9× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs 10 IAP tiers vs 4 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Before/After: Photo Compare
vs
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.1K
▶
$1.64M
Annual revenue (est.)
$12.8K
▶
$19.73M
Lifetime installs (est.)
10K
▶
16.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
▶
3.9M
App Store rating
4.57★
▶
4.75★
Total ratings
191
▶
110K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
▶
$12.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
▶
10 tiers

Before/After: Photo Compare

Fancygames, Ltd.
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Mar 13, 2021
Last updated
Jun 11, 2025
File size
55.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.8.2
Languages
Arabic, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +19 more
View full Before/After: Photo Compare report →

Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera

DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Aug 17, 2018
Last updated
Jun 8, 2026
File size
138.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.17.3
Languages
English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
View full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report →

Before/After: Photo Compare trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

Before/After: Photo Compare App Store page →Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera App Store page →

Related comparisons

Before After Photo Compare iOS vs Youtube iOSBefore After Photo Compare iOS vs Promptsmart PRO Teleprompter iOSBefore After Photo Compare iOS vs Photopills iOSBefore After Photo Compare iOS vs Capcut Photo Video Editor iOSBefore After Photo Compare iOS vs Instagram iOSBefore After Photo Compare iOS vs Canva AI Video Photo Editor iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Before/After: Photo Compare or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $1.64M per month, while Before/After: Photo Compare earns about $1.1K. That is a 1542.2× revenue gap (~$1.64M more per month for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera). Annual revenue: Before/After: Photo Compare ≈ $12.8K/year, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $19.73M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Before/After: Photo Compare or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera leads with about 16.5M estimated downloads vs 10K for Before/After: Photo Compare - a 1724.9× gap. Before/After: Photo Compare's App Store downloads are estimated from 191 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 110K ratings.
Are Before/After: Photo Compare and Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Before/After: Photo Compare and Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera offer? v
Before/After: Photo Compare: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Before/After: Photo Compare runs a "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)" monetization model; Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Before/After: Photo Compare or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Before/After: Photo Compare 191 ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 110K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Before/After: Photo Compare vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.1K for Before/After: Photo Compare and $1.64M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Before/After: Photo Compare or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.