Bend: Stretching & Flexibility vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker
Bend: Stretching & Flexibility
Bend Health & Fitness, Inc.
Google Play
$363.4K/mo
~$4.36M/yr · 5.0M installs
VS
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker
Lifesum
Google Play
$1.63M/mo
~$19.62M/yr · 29.4M installs
Revenue winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+350% vs other
Installs winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+494% vs other
MAU winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+291% vs other
Rating winner
Bend: Stretching & Flexibility wins
+7% vs other
Why Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 4× more per month than Bend: Stretching & Flexibility - $1.63M vs $363.4K.
- Premium pricing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker charges $19.97/mo vs Bend: Stretching & Flexibility's $12.62/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker has ~29.4M lifetime installs vs Bend: Stretching & Flexibility's ~5.0M - 5.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Bend: Stretching & Flexibility
vs
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$363.4K
▶
$1.63M
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.36M
▶
$19.62M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.0M
▶
29.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
639K
▶
2.5M
App Store rating
4.69★
◀
4.40★
Total ratings
154K
▶
376K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.62
▶
$19.97
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 14, 2022
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.6.2
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Bend: Stretching & Flexibility trajectory
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Bend: Stretching & Flexibility or Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $1.63M per month, while Bend: Stretching & Flexibility earns about $363.4K. That is a 4.5× revenue gap (~$1.27M more per month for Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Bend: Stretching & Flexibility ≈ $4.36M/year, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $19.62M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Bend: Stretching & Flexibility or Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 29.4M estimated downloads vs 5.0M for Bend: Stretching & Flexibility - a 5.9× gap. Bend: Stretching & Flexibility reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Bend: Stretching & Flexibility and Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Bend: Stretching & Flexibility and Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Bend: Stretching & Flexibility: IAP range $1.99 - $79.99 per item. Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $3.99 - $99.99 per item. Bend: Stretching & Flexibility runs a "Subscription (~$12.62/mo)" monetization model; Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$19.97/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Bend: Stretching & Flexibility or Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Bend: Stretching & Flexibility edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Bend: Stretching & Flexibility 3K ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker 14K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Bend: Stretching & Flexibility vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $363.4K for Bend: Stretching & Flexibility and $1.63M for Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Bend: Stretching & Flexibility or Lifesum: AI Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.