BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam vs PhotoPills
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam
Imagine_Works
Google Play
$288/mo
~$3.5K/yr · 10K installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills, SL
Google Play
$56.2K/mo
~$674.2K/yr · 426K installs
Revenue winner
PhotoPills wins
+19408% vs other
Installs winner
PhotoPills wins
+4325% vs other
MAU winner
PhotoPills wins
+3160% vs other
Rating winner
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam wins
+5% vs other
Why PhotoPills is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PhotoPills earns roughly 195× more per month than BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam - $56.2K vs $288.
- Bigger install base. PhotoPills has ~426K lifetime installs vs BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam's ~10K - 44.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PhotoPills report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$288
▶
$56.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.5K
▶
$674.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
10K
▶
426K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
▶
101K
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.76★
Total ratings
201
▶
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- USD2.49
- Released
- Apr 15, 2025
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.3.24
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- May 26, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.8.21
- Languages
- -
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills earns about $56.2K per month, while BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam earns about $288. That is a 195.1× revenue gap (~$55.9K more per month for PhotoPills). Annual revenue: BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam ≈ $3.5K/year, PhotoPills ≈ $674.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills leads with about 426K estimated downloads vs 10K for BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam - a 44.2× gap. BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play. PhotoPills reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam and PhotoPills in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam and PhotoPills have in-app purchases? v
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PhotoPills does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam runs "Paid app ($2.49)", PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)".
Which has better ratings, BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam or PhotoPills? v
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam 3 ratings, PhotoPills 512 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $288 for BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam and $56.2K for PhotoPills are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam or PhotoPills to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.