BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam vs FlicUp
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam
Seungyun Kim
App Store
$125/mo
~$1.5K/yr · 2K installs
VS
FlicUp
Marius Ferraro
App Store
$187/mo
~$2.2K/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
FlicUp wins
+50% vs other
Installs winner
FlicUp wins
+28% vs other
MAU winner
FlicUp wins
+29% vs other
Rating winner
FlicUp wins
+3% vs other
Why FlicUp is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Subscription model. FlicUp runs a $5.99/mo subscription that compounds; BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. FlicUp runs 6 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$125
▶
$187
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.5K
▶
$2.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
752
▶
969
App Store rating
4.87★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
47
◀
1
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$5.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
6 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Feb 27, 2025
- Last updated
- Jul 3, 2026
- File size
- 71.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.3.29
- Languages
- English, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Chinese
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 23, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 11.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.3
- Languages
- English
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam trajectory
FlicUp trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam or FlicUp? v
FlicUp earns about $187 per month, while BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam earns about $125. That is a 1.5× revenue gap (~$62 more per month for FlicUp). Annual revenue: BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam ≈ $1.5K/year, FlicUp ≈ $2.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam or FlicUp? v
FlicUp leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 2K for BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam - a 1.3× gap. BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam's App Store downloads are estimated from 47 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. FlicUp's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings.
Are BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam and FlicUp in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam and FlicUp offer? v
BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam: no IAP detected on the public listing. FlicUp: IAP range 6 tiers detected. BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam runs a "Paid app ($1.99)" monetization model; FlicUp runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam or FlicUp? v
FlicUp edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam 47 ratings, FlicUp 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam vs FlicUp revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $125 for BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam and $187 for FlicUp are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BerryFilm - Korean Style Cam or FlicUp to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
