Bimano Boulder vs Qibla Finder for Wear OS
Bimano Boulder
Bimano GmbH
Google Play
$218/mo
~$2.6K/yr · 3K installs
VS
Qibla Finder for Wear OS
Limoo
Google Play
$6/mo
~$69/yr · 485 installs
Revenue winner
Bimano Boulder wins
+3533% vs other
Installs winner
Bimano Boulder wins
+610% vs other
MAU winner
Bimano Boulder wins
+987% vs other
Rating winnerTied
Why Bimano Boulder is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bimano Boulder earns roughly 36× more per month than Qibla Finder for Wear OS - $218 vs $6.
- Subscription model. Bimano Boulder runs a $23.49/mo subscription that compounds; Qibla Finder for Wear OS relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Bimano Boulder has ~3K lifetime installs vs Qibla Finder for Wear OS's ~485 - 7.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Bimano Boulder report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Bimano Boulder
vs
Qibla Finder for Wear OS
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$218
◀
$6
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.6K
◀
$69
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
◀
485
Monthly active users (est.)?
595.812
◀
54.805
App Store rating
-
=
-
Total ratings
0
=
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$23.49
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 13, 2022
- Last updated
- Jan 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.1.6
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Jul 18, 2023
- Last updated
- Oct 5, 2023
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.3
- Languages
- -
Bimano Boulder trajectory
Qibla Finder for Wear OS trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Bimano Boulder or Qibla Finder for Wear OS? v
Bimano Boulder earns about $218 per month, while Qibla Finder for Wear OS earns about $6. That is a 36.3× revenue gap (~$212 more per month for Bimano Boulder). Annual revenue: Bimano Boulder ≈ $2.6K/year, Qibla Finder for Wear OS ≈ $69/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Bimano Boulder or Qibla Finder for Wear OS? v
Bimano Boulder leads with about 3K estimated downloads vs 485 for Qibla Finder for Wear OS - a 7.1× gap. Bimano Boulder reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Qibla Finder for Wear OS reports 100+ installs on Google Play.
Are Bimano Boulder and Qibla Finder for Wear OS in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Bimano Boulder and Qibla Finder for Wear OS offer? v
Bimano Boulder: IAP range $8.49 - $64.99 per item. Qibla Finder for Wear OS: no IAP detected on the public listing. Bimano Boulder runs a "Subscription (~$23.49/mo)" monetization model; Qibla Finder for Wear OS runs "Paid app ($0.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
How accurate are these Bimano Boulder vs Qibla Finder for Wear OS revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $218 for Bimano Boulder and $6 for Qibla Finder for Wear OS are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Bimano Boulder or Qibla Finder for Wear OS to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.