BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$311.8K/mo
~$3.74M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting
Fastic GmbH
Google Play
$797.2K/mo
~$9.57M/yr · 17.9M installs
Revenue winner
Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting wins
+156% vs other
Installs winner
Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting wins
+367% vs other
MAU winner
Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting wins
+145% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+4% vs other
Why Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting earns roughly 3× more per month than BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - $797.2K vs $311.8K.
- Premium pricing. Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting charges $24.46/mo vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter's $8.90/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting has ~17.9M lifetime installs vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter's ~3.8M - 4.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$311.8K
▶
$797.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.74M
▶
$9.57M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
▶
17.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
548K
▶
1.3M
App Store rating
4.54★
◀
4.36★
Total ratings
286K
▶
421K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
▶
$24.46
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 23, 2019
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 1.256.0
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting? v
Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting earns about $797.2K per month, while BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $311.8K. That is a 2.6× revenue gap (~$485.4K more per month for Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.74M/year, Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting ≈ $9.57M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting? v
Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting leads with about 17.9M estimated downloads vs 3.8M for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - a 4.7× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting: IAP range $3.99 - $149.99 per item. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting runs "Subscription (~$24.46/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting 20K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $311.8K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $797.2K for Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fastic Weight Loss & Fasting to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.