BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$313.1K/mo
~$3.76M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Fig - Food Is Good
Google Play
$85.6K/mo
~$1.03M/yr · 790K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+266% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+387% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+267% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+1% vs other
Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 4× more per month than Fig: Food Scanner & Guide - $313.1K vs $85.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $8.90/mo vs $19.57/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~3.8M lifetime installs vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide's ~790K - 4.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$313.1K
◀
$85.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.76M
◀
$1.03M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
◀
790K
Monthly active users (est.)?
550K
◀
150K
App Store rating
4.53★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
286K
◀
7K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
▶
$19.57
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 30, 2021
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.148.2
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $313.1K per month, while Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns about $85.6K. That is a 3.7× revenue gap (~$227.5K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.76M/year, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide ≈ $1.03M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 3.8M estimated downloads vs 790K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide - a 4.9× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Fig: Food Scanner & Guide in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Fig: Food Scanner & Guide offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide: IAP range $4.79 - $79.99 per item. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fig: Food Scanner & Guide runs "Subscription (~$19.57/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $313.1K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $85.6K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.