BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Fitatu AI Calorie Counter
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$311.8K/mo
~$3.74M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter
V Team
Google Play
$745.6K/mo
~$8.95M/yr · 9.2M installs
Revenue winner
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter wins
+139% vs other
Installs winner
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter wins
+140% vs other
MAU winner
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter wins
+139% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+1% vs other
Why Fitatu AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitatu AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 2× more per month than BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - $745.6K vs $311.8K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitatu AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $6.89/mo vs $8.90/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitatu AI Calorie Counter has ~9.2M lifetime installs vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter's ~3.8M - 2.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitatu AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$311.8K
▶
$745.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.74M
▶
$8.95M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
▶
9.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
548K
▶
1.3M
App Store rating
4.54★
◀
4.47★
Total ratings
286K
◀
149K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
◀
$6.89
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 23, 2015
- Last updated
- Apr 21, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.14.1
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fitatu AI Calorie Counter? v
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter earns about $745.6K per month, while BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $311.8K. That is a 2.4× revenue gap (~$433.8K more per month for Fitatu AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.74M/year, Fitatu AI Calorie Counter ≈ $8.95M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fitatu AI Calorie Counter? v
Fitatu AI Calorie Counter leads with about 9.2M estimated downloads vs 3.8M for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - a 2.4× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Fitatu AI Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Fitatu AI Calorie Counter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Fitatu AI Calorie Counter offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Fitatu AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $47.90 per item. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitatu AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$6.89/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fitatu AI Calorie Counter? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, Fitatu AI Calorie Counter 80 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Fitatu AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $311.8K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $745.6K for Fitatu AI Calorie Counter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Fitatu AI Calorie Counter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.