BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$347.1K/mo
~$4.17M/yr · 4.3M installs
VS
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
Extramile Limited
Google Play
$54.2K/mo
~$650.1K/yr · 501K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+541% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+752% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+541% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+2% vs other
Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 6× more per month than FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home - $347.1K vs $54.2K.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $8.90/mo vs $22.35/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~4.3M lifetime installs vs FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home's ~501K - 8.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$347.1K
◀
$54.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.17M
◀
$650.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.3M
◀
501K
Monthly active users (est.)?
611K
◀
95K
App Store rating
4.52★
◀
4.44★
Total ratings
325K
◀
22K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
▶
$22.35
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 28, 2023
- Last updated
- May 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.27
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $347.1K per month, while FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home earns about $54.2K. That is a 6.4× revenue gap (~$292.9K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $4.17M/year, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home ≈ $650.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 4.3M estimated downloads vs 501K for FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home - a 8.5× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home: IAP range $9.99 - $49.99 per item. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home runs "Subscription (~$22.35/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings, FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $347.1K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $54.2K for FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or FitMe - Lazy Workout at Home to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.