BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$313.2K/mo
~$3.76M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Foodvisor
Google Play
$496.0K/mo
~$5.95M/yr · 10.2M installs
Revenue winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+58% vs other
Installs winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+166% vs other
MAU winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+43% vs other
Rating winner
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter wins
+2% vs other
Why Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 2× more per month than BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - $496.0K vs $313.2K.
- Premium pricing. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter charges $27.91/mo vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter's $8.90/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter has ~10.2M lifetime installs vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter's ~3.8M - 2.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$313.2K
▶
$496.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.76M
▶
$5.95M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
▶
10.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
550K
▶
788K
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.61★
Total ratings
286K
◀
151K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
▶
$27.91
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 8, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.0-3
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter earns about $496.0K per month, while BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $313.2K. That is a 1.6× revenue gap (~$182.8K more per month for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.76M/year, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter ≈ $5.95M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 3.8M for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - a 2.7× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $6.49 - $119.99 per item. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$27.91/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter? v
Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $313.2K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $496.0K for Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Foodvisor - AI Calorie Counter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.