BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs GI and glycemic load
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$313.2K/mo
~$3.76M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
GI and glycemic load
Sipione
Google Play
$46/mo
~$546/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+680813% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+150985% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+103771% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+454% vs other
Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 6809× more per month than GI and glycemic load - $313.2K vs $46.
- Subscription model. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a $8.90/mo subscription that compounds; GI and glycemic load relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~3.8M lifetime installs vs GI and glycemic load's ~3K - 1510.8× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.54★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
GI and glycemic load
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$313.2K
◀
$46
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.76M
◀
$546
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
550K
◀
529.776
App Store rating
4.54★
◀
-
Total ratings
286K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Sep 18, 2016
- Last updated
- Sep 30, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.10
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
GI and glycemic load trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or GI and glycemic load? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $313.2K per month, while GI and glycemic load earns about $46. That is a 6809.1× revenue gap (~$313.2K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.76M/year, GI and glycemic load ≈ $546/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or GI and glycemic load? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 3.8M estimated downloads vs 3K for GI and glycemic load - a 1510.8× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. GI and glycemic load reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and GI and glycemic load in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and GI and glycemic load offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. GI and glycemic load: no IAP detected on the public listing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; GI and glycemic load runs "Paid app ($1.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or GI and glycemic load? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, GI and glycemic load 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs GI and glycemic load revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $313.2K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $46 for GI and glycemic load are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or GI and glycemic load to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.