BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs NoiseFit: Health & Fitness
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$313.2K/mo
~$3.76M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness
Noise
Google Play
$2.32M/mo
~$27.85M/yr · 53.2M installs
Revenue winner
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness wins
+641% vs other
Installs winner
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness wins
+1283% vs other
MAU winner
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness wins
+645% vs other
Rating winner
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness wins
+1% vs other
Why NoiseFit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- NoiseFit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 7× more per month than BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - $2.32M vs $313.2K.
- Aggressive pricing. NoiseFit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $1.71/mo vs $8.90/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. NoiseFit: Health & Fitness has ~53.2M lifetime installs vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter's ~3.8M - 13.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NoiseFit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$313.2K
▶
$2.32M
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.76M
▶
$27.85M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
▶
53.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
550K
▶
4.1M
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.57★
Total ratings
286K
▶
2.4M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
◀
$1.71
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 2, 2020
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.1.3
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or NoiseFit: Health & Fitness? v
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.32M per month, while BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $313.2K. That is a 7.4× revenue gap (~$2.01M more per month for NoiseFit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.76M/year, NoiseFit: Health & Fitness ≈ $27.85M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or NoiseFit: Health & Fitness? v
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness leads with about 53.2M estimated downloads vs 3.8M for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter - a 13.8× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. NoiseFit: Health & Fitness reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and NoiseFit: Health & Fitness in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and NoiseFit: Health & Fitness offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. NoiseFit: Health & Fitness: IAP range $0.49 - $5.99 per item. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; NoiseFit: Health & Fitness runs "Subscription (~$1.71/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or NoiseFit: Health & Fitness? v
NoiseFit: Health & Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, NoiseFit: Health & Fitness 368 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs NoiseFit: Health & Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $313.2K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $2.32M for NoiseFit: Health & Fitness are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or NoiseFit: Health & Fitness to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.