BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs OpenRunner : bike & hike maps
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$311.8K/mo
~$3.74M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
OpenRunner : bike & hike maps
Openrunner
Google Play
$87.4K/mo
~$1.05M/yr · 883K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+257% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+334% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+256% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+38% vs other
Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 4× more per month than OpenRunner : bike & hike maps - $311.8K vs $87.4K.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $8.90/mo vs $9.85/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~3.8M lifetime installs vs OpenRunner : bike & hike maps's ~883K - 4.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.54★ vs 3.29★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
OpenRunner : bike & hike maps
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$311.8K
◀
$87.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.74M
◀
$1.05M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
◀
883K
Monthly active users (est.)?
548K
◀
154K
App Store rating
4.54★
◀
3.29★
Total ratings
286K
◀
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
▶
$9.85
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 23, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
OpenRunner : bike & hike maps trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or OpenRunner : bike & hike maps? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $311.8K per month, while OpenRunner : bike & hike maps earns about $87.4K. That is a 3.6× revenue gap (~$224.3K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.74M/year, OpenRunner : bike & hike maps ≈ $1.05M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or OpenRunner : bike & hike maps? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 3.8M estimated downloads vs 883K for OpenRunner : bike & hike maps - a 4.3× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. OpenRunner : bike & hike maps reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and OpenRunner : bike & hike maps in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and OpenRunner : bike & hike maps offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. OpenRunner : bike & hike maps: IAP range $2.49 - $38.99 per item. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; OpenRunner : bike & hike maps runs "Subscription (~$9.85/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or OpenRunner : bike & hike maps? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.3 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, OpenRunner : bike & hike maps 8 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs OpenRunner : bike & hike maps revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $311.8K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $87.4K for OpenRunner : bike & hike maps are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or OpenRunner : bike & hike maps to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.