BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$311.8K/mo
~$3.74M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Joyride GmbH
Google Play
$39.1K/mo
~$469.3K/yr · 320K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+697% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+1098% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+697% vs other
Rating winner
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker wins
+0% vs other
Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 8× more per month than WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker - $311.8K vs $39.1K.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $8.90/mo vs $11.60/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~3.8M lifetime installs vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker's ~320K - 12.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$311.8K
◀
$39.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.74M
◀
$469.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
◀
320K
Monthly active users (est.)?
548K
◀
69K
App Store rating
4.54★
▶
4.56★
Total ratings
286K
◀
3K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
▶
$11.60
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 7, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 202604.1.2
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $311.8K per month, while WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker earns about $39.1K. That is a 8.0× revenue gap (~$272.7K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.74M/year, WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker ≈ $469.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 3.8M estimated downloads vs 320K for WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker - a 12.0× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker: IAP range $2.99 - $44.99 per item. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.60/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker? v
WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker 43 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $311.8K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $39.1K for WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or WeightBuddy: Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.