BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker

BitePal: AI Calorie Counter

RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$347.2K/mo
~$4.17M/yr · 4.3M installs
VS

Nutrition & Calorie Tracker

PLHGlobal
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 428K installs
Revenue winner BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins +34722100% vs other
Installs winner BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins +898% vs other
MAU winner BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins +698% vs other
Rating winner BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins +25% vs other

Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 347221× more per month than Nutrition & Calorie Tracker - $347.2K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a $8.90/mo subscription that compounds; Nutrition & Calorie Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~4.3M lifetime installs vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker's ~428K - 10.0× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.52★ vs 3.63★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
Nutrition & Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$347.2K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.17M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.3M
◀
428K
Monthly active users (est.)?
611K
◀
77K
App Store rating
4.52★
◀
3.63★
Total ratings
324K
◀
874
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

BitePal: AI Calorie Counter

RefaceLithuania
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
May 3, 2024
Last updated
Jun 26, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.20.0
Languages
-
View full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report →

Nutrition & Calorie Tracker

PLHGlobal
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Feb 9, 2026
Last updated
Jun 25, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.0.7
Languages
-
View full Nutrition & Calorie Tracker report →

BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Nutrition & Calorie Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

BitePal: AI Calorie Counter Play Store page →Nutrition & Calorie Tracker Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Cal AI Calorie Tracker iOS vs Bitepal AI Calorie Counter AndroidBitepal AI Calorie Counter Android vs Calorie Counter Mynetdiary AndroidBitepal AI Calorie Counter Android vs Cal AI Food Calorie Tracker AndroidBitepal AI Calorie Counter Android vs Myfitnesspal Calorie Counter AndroidBitepal AI Calorie Counter Android vs Yuka Food Amp Cosmetic Scanner AndroidTraininpink by Carlotta Gagna iOS vs Bitepal AI Calorie Counter Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $347.2K per month, while Nutrition & Calorie Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$347.2K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $4.17M/year, Nutrition & Calorie Tracker ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 4.3M estimated downloads vs 428K for Nutrition & Calorie Tracker - a 10.0× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Nutrition & Calorie Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Nutrition & Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Nutrition & Calorie Tracker offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Nutrition & Calorie Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Nutrition & Calorie Tracker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings, Nutrition & Calorie Tracker 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $347.2K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $0 for Nutrition & Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.