BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$311.8K/mo
~$3.74M/yr · 3.8M installs
VS
Nutrition & Calorie Tracker
PLHGlobal
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 251K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+31179400% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+1427% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+1155% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+38% vs other
Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 311794× more per month than Nutrition & Calorie Tracker - $311.8K vs $0.
- Subscription model. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a $8.90/mo subscription that compounds; Nutrition & Calorie Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~3.8M lifetime installs vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker's ~251K - 15.3× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.54★ vs 3.29★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
Nutrition & Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$311.8K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.74M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.8M
◀
251K
Monthly active users (est.)?
548K
◀
44K
App Store rating
4.54★
◀
3.29★
Total ratings
286K
◀
455
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 9, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.2
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
Nutrition & Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $311.8K per month, while Nutrition & Calorie Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$311.8K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $3.74M/year, Nutrition & Calorie Tracker ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 3.8M estimated downloads vs 251K for Nutrition & Calorie Tracker - a 15.3× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Nutrition & Calorie Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Nutrition & Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and Nutrition & Calorie Tracker offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Nutrition & Calorie Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Nutrition & Calorie Tracker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.3 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 2K ratings, Nutrition & Calorie Tracker 3 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $311.8K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $0 for Nutrition & Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.