BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$346.3K/mo
~$4.16M/yr · 4.3M installs
VS
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
ライフログテクノロジー株式会社
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 686K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+34630300% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+521% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+383% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+13% vs other
Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 346303× more per month than PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 - $346.3K vs $0.
- Subscription model. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a $8.90/mo subscription that compounds; PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~4.3M lifetime installs vs PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理's ~686K - 6.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.52★ vs 4.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
vs
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$346.3K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.16M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.3M
◀
686K
Monthly active users (est.)?
609K
◀
126K
App Store rating
4.52★
◀
4.00★
Total ratings
323K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.90
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 14, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 20, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 2.5.18
- Languages
- -
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $346.3K per month, while PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$346.3K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $4.16M/year, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 4.3M estimated downloads vs 686K for PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 - a 6.2× gap. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 offer? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理: no IAP detected on the public listing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings, PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 4 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: AI Calorie Counter vs PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $346.3K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter and $0 for PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: AI Calorie Counter or PFC管理はカロミル - ダイエットのカロリー計算や健康管理 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.