BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$89.6K/mo
~$1.07M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Next Vision Limited
App Store
$35.3K/mo
~$423.5K/yr · 631K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+154% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+755% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+661% vs other
Rating winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+1% vs other
Why BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns roughly 3× more per month than Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - $89.6K vs $35.3K.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker undercuts at $2.00/mo vs $3.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's ~631K - 8.6× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs 8 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$89.6K
◀
$35.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.07M
◀
$423.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
◀
631K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
182K
App Store rating
4.66★
▶
4.70★
Total ratings
49K
◀
18K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
▶
$3.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 166.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 11, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- 220.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.68
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +14 more
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $89.6K per month, while Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns about $35.3K. That is a 2.5× revenue gap (~$54.3K more per month for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $1.07M/year, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter ≈ $423.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 631K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - a 8.6× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter: IAP range 1 tiers detected. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$3.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 49K ratings, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter 18K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $89.6K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $35.3K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.