BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$89.6K/mo
~$1.07M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans
Gymondo
App Store
$3.1K/mo
~$37.7K/yr · 22K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+2751% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+23896% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+21239% vs other
Rating winner
Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans wins
+0% vs other
Why BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns roughly 29× more per month than Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans - $89.6K vs $3.1K.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker undercuts at $2.00/mo vs $9.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans's ~22K - 240.0× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs 8 IAP tiers vs 7 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$89.6K
◀
$3.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.07M
◀
$37.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
◀
22K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
6K
App Store rating
4.66★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
49K
◀
899
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
7 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 166.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 29, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 185.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2026.13.2
- Languages
- English, German, Italian, Spanish
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $89.6K per month, while Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans earns about $3.1K. That is a 28.5× revenue gap (~$86.4K more per month for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $1.07M/year, Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans ≈ $37.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 22K for Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans - a 240.0× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans's App Store downloads are estimated from 899 ratings.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans: IAP range 7 tiers detected. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans? v
Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 49K ratings, Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans 899 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $89.6K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $3.1K for Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Gymondo: Fitness Workout Plans to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
