BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Health Sense: Track & Record
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Health Sense: Track & Record
Health Applines
Google Play
$700.2K/mo
~$8.40M/yr · 17.3M installs
Revenue winner
Health Sense: Track & Record wins
+70024900% vs other
Installs winner
Health Sense: Track & Record wins
+220% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+13% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+29% vs other
Why Health Sense: Track & Record is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Health Sense: Track & Record earns roughly 700249× more per month than BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - $700.2K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Health Sense: Track & Record runs a $10.93/mo subscription that compounds; BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Health Sense: Track & Record has ~17.3M lifetime installs vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's ~5.4M - 3.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Health Sense: Track & Record report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Health Sense: Track & Record
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$700.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$8.40M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
▶
17.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
1.2M
App Store rating
4.66★
◀
3.60★
Total ratings
49K
◀
9K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$10.93
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 166.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 16, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 10, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.25.0
- Languages
- -
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Health Sense: Track & Record trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
Health Sense: Track & Record earns about $700.2K per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$700.2K more per month for Health Sense: Track & Record). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $0/year, Health Sense: Track & Record ≈ $8.40M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
Health Sense: Track & Record leads with about 17.3M estimated downloads vs 5.4M for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - a 3.2× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Health Sense: Track & Record reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Health Sense: Track & Record in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Health Sense: Track & Record offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Health Sense: Track & Record: IAP range $2.99 - $39.99 per item. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Health Sense: Track & Record runs "Subscription (~$10.93/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.1 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 49K ratings, Health Sense: Track & Record 880 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Health Sense: Track & Record revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $700.2K for Health Sense: Track & Record are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Health Sense: Track & Record to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.