BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Home Workout App: Fitness
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$78.2K/mo
~$938.6K/yr · 4.7M installs
VS
Home Workout App: Fitness
EZ Health
Google Play
$612.8K/mo
~$7.35M/yr · 8.0M installs
Revenue winner
Home Workout App: Fitness wins
+683% vs other
Installs winner
Home Workout App: Fitness wins
+70% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+16% vs other
Rating winner
Home Workout App: Fitness wins
+5% vs other
Why Home Workout App: Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Home Workout App: Fitness earns roughly 8× more per month than BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - $612.8K vs $78.2K.
- Premium pricing. Home Workout App: Fitness charges $24.15/mo vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's $2.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Home Workout App: Fitness has ~8.0M lifetime installs vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's ~4.7M - 1.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Home Workout App: Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Home Workout App: Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$78.2K
▶
$612.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$938.6K
▶
$7.35M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.7M
▶
8.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
◀
1.0M
App Store rating
4.66★
▶
4.89★
Total ratings
43K
▶
123K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
▶
$24.15
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- May 1, 2026
- File size
- 161.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 24, 2024
- Last updated
- Mar 17, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.3.6
- Languages
- -
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Home Workout App: Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Home Workout App: Fitness? v
Home Workout App: Fitness earns about $612.8K per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $78.2K. That is a 7.8× revenue gap (~$534.6K more per month for Home Workout App: Fitness). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $938.6K/year, Home Workout App: Fitness ≈ $7.35M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Home Workout App: Fitness? v
Home Workout App: Fitness leads with about 8.0M estimated downloads vs 4.7M for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - a 1.7× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 43K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Home Workout App: Fitness reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Home Workout App: Fitness in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Home Workout App: Fitness offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Home Workout App: Fitness: IAP range $8.33 - $69.99 per item. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; Home Workout App: Fitness runs "Subscription (~$24.15/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Home Workout App: Fitness? v
Home Workout App: Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 43K ratings, Home Workout App: Fitness 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Home Workout App: Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $78.2K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $612.8K for Home Workout App: Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Home Workout App: Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.