BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$89.4K/mo
~$1.07M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness
Hybrid Calisthenics
Google Play
$43.4K/mo
~$520.7K/yr · 314K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+106% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+1616% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+2161% vs other
Rating winner
Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness wins
+3% vs other
Why BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns roughly 2× more per month than Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness - $89.4K vs $43.4K.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker undercuts at $2.00/mo vs $35.34/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness's ~314K - 17.2× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$89.4K
◀
$43.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.07M
◀
$520.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
◀
314K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
61K
App Store rating
4.66★
▶
4.81★
Total ratings
49K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
▶
$35.34
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 166.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 28, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.38.0
- Languages
- -
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $89.4K per month, while Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness earns about $43.4K. That is a 2.1× revenue gap (~$46.0K more per month for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $1.07M/year, Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness ≈ $520.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 314K for Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness - a 17.2× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness: IAP range $9.99 - $124.99 per item. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness runs "Subscription (~$35.34/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness? v
Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 49K ratings, Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness 467 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $89.4K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $43.4K for Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Hybrid Calisthenics - Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.