BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$78.2K/mo
~$938.6K/yr · 4.7M installs
VS
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
MacrosFirst, Inc.
App Store
$93.8K/mo
~$1.13M/yr · 551K installs
Revenue winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+20% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+754% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+649% vs other
Rating winner
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins
+4% vs other
Why MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Premium pricing. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker charges $11.99/mo vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's $2.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$78.2K
▶
$93.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$938.6K
▶
$1.13M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.7M
◀
551K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
◀
161K
App Store rating
4.66★
▶
4.86★
Total ratings
43K
◀
16K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
▶
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- May 1, 2026
- File size
- 161.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 174.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.590
- Languages
- English
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $93.8K per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $78.2K. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$15.6K more per month for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $938.6K/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.13M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.7M estimated downloads vs 551K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 8.5× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 43K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 7 tiers detected. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 43K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 16K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $78.2K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $93.8K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.