BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Muscle Monster Workout Planner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$89.4K/mo
~$1.07M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Muscle Monster Workout Planner
TechPionners Team
Google Play
$811.0K/mo
~$9.73M/yr · 6.8M installs
Revenue winner
Muscle Monster Workout Planner wins
+807% vs other
Installs winner
Muscle Monster Workout Planner wins
+27% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+42% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+2% vs other
Why Muscle Monster Workout Planner is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Muscle Monster Workout Planner earns roughly 9× more per month than BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - $811.0K vs $89.4K.
- Premium pricing. Muscle Monster Workout Planner charges $32.23/mo vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's $2.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Muscle Monster Workout Planner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Muscle Monster Workout Planner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$89.4K
▶
$811.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.07M
▶
$9.73M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
▶
6.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
974K
App Store rating
4.66★
◀
4.57★
Total ratings
49K
▶
78K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
▶
$32.23
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 166.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 26, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.21.0
- Languages
- -
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Muscle Monster Workout Planner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Muscle Monster Workout Planner? v
Muscle Monster Workout Planner earns about $811.0K per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $89.4K. That is a 9.1× revenue gap (~$721.6K more per month for Muscle Monster Workout Planner). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $1.07M/year, Muscle Monster Workout Planner ≈ $9.73M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Muscle Monster Workout Planner? v
Muscle Monster Workout Planner leads with about 6.8M estimated downloads vs 5.4M for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - a 1.3× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Muscle Monster Workout Planner reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Muscle Monster Workout Planner in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Muscle Monster Workout Planner offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Muscle Monster Workout Planner: IAP range $7.99 - $129.99 per item. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; Muscle Monster Workout Planner runs "Subscription (~$32.23/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Muscle Monster Workout Planner? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 49K ratings, Muscle Monster Workout Planner 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Muscle Monster Workout Planner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $89.4K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $811.0K for Muscle Monster Workout Planner are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Muscle Monster Workout Planner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.