BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$89.4K/mo
~$1.07M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Giga Studios, Inc
App Store
$211.3K/mo
~$2.54M/yr · 4.3M installs
Revenue winner
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+136% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+25% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+23% vs other
Rating winner
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+3% vs other
Why Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns roughly 2× more per month than BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - $211.3K vs $89.4K.
- Premium pricing. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner charges $14.99/mo vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's $2.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$89.4K
▶
$211.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.07M
▶
$2.54M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
◀
4.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
1.1M
App Store rating
4.66★
▶
4.81★
Total ratings
49K
◀
39K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
▶
$14.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
5 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 166.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 24, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 174.5 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 3.17.2
- Languages
- English
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $211.3K per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $89.4K. That is a 2.4× revenue gap (~$121.8K more per month for Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $1.07M/year, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $2.54M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 4.3M for Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner - a 1.2× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 39K ratings.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner: IAP range 5 tiers detected. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 49K ratings, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner 39K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $89.4K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $211.3K for Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.