BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs pliability: stretch + mobility
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$78.2K/mo
~$938.6K/yr · 4.7M installs
VS
pliability: stretch + mobility
pliability
Google Play
$65.1K/mo
~$781.3K/yr · 444K installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+20% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+960% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+1373% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+15% vs other
Why BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker undercuts at $2.00/mo vs $44.25/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker has ~4.7M lifetime installs vs pliability: stretch + mobility's ~444K - 10.6× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker sits at 4.66★ vs 4.06★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
pliability: stretch + mobility
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$78.2K
◀
$65.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$938.6K
◀
$781.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.7M
◀
444K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
◀
82K
App Store rating
4.66★
◀
4.06★
Total ratings
43K
◀
4K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
▶
$44.25
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- May 1, 2026
- File size
- 161.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 15, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 20, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.11.1
- Languages
- -
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
pliability: stretch + mobility trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or pliability: stretch + mobility? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $78.2K per month, while pliability: stretch + mobility earns about $65.1K. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$13.1K more per month for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $938.6K/year, pliability: stretch + mobility ≈ $781.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or pliability: stretch + mobility? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.7M estimated downloads vs 444K for pliability: stretch + mobility - a 10.6× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 43K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. pliability: stretch + mobility reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and pliability: stretch + mobility in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and pliability: stretch + mobility offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 7 tiers detected. pliability: stretch + mobility: IAP range $13.99 - $139.99 per item. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; pliability: stretch + mobility runs "Subscription (~$44.25/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or pliability: stretch + mobility? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 43K ratings, pliability: stretch + mobility 269 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs pliability: stretch + mobility revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $78.2K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $65.1K for pliability: stretch + mobility are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or pliability: stretch + mobility to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.