BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk

BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker

Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$89.2K/mo
~$1.07M/yr · 5.4M installs
VS

Strava: Run, Bike, Walk

Strava, Inc.
App Store
$1.96M/mo
~$23.50M/yr · 18.0M installs
Revenue winner Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins +2094% vs other
Installs winner Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins +235% vs other
MAU winner Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins +185% vs other
Rating winner Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins +3% vs other

Why Strava: Run, Bike, Walk is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk earns roughly 22× more per month than BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - $1.96M vs $89.2K.
  2. Premium pricing. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk charges $5.99/mo vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's $2.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has ~18.0M lifetime installs vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's ~5.4M - 3.4× the funnel top.
  4. Charts placement. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk ranks #57 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Strava: Run, Bike, Walk report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$89.2K
$1.96M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.07M
$23.50M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
18.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
3.9M
App Store rating
4.66★
4.81★
Total ratings
49K
362K
US grossing rank
-
#57
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
$5.99
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
6 tiers

BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker

Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 10, 2024
Last updated
Jun 29, 2026
File size
166.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.20.0
Languages
English
View full BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker report →

Strava: Run, Bike, Walk

Strava, Inc.
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Mar 24, 2011
Last updated
Jun 26, 2026
File size
431.4 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
470.0.0
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German +15 more
View full Strava: Run, Bike, Walk report →

BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Strava: Run, Bike, Walk trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk earns about $1.96M per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $89.2K. That is a 21.9× revenue gap (~$1.87M more per month for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $1.07M/year, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk ≈ $23.50M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk leads with about 18.0M estimated downloads vs 5.4M for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - a 3.4× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk's App Store downloads are estimated from 362K ratings.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk: IAP range 6 tiers detected. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; Strava: Run, Bike, Walk runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo, fitness-sub) · calibrated by US grossing rank #57". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 49K ratings, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk 362K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $89.2K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $1.96M for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.