BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor

BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker

Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$78.2K/mo
~$938.6K/yr · 4.7M installs
VS

StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor

One Hundred Bad Ideas Limited
App Store
$171.4K/mo
~$2.06M/yr · 2.1M installs
Revenue winner StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor wins +119% vs other
Installs winner BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins +128% vs other
MAU winner BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins +127% vs other
Rating winner StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor wins +0% vs other

Why StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor earns roughly 2× more per month than BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - $171.4K vs $78.2K.
  2. Premium pricing. StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor charges $12.99/mo vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's $2.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$78.2K
$171.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$938.6K
$2.06M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.7M
2.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
532K
App Store rating
4.66★
4.68★
Total ratings
43K
19K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.00
$12.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
5 tiers

BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker

Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 10, 2024
Last updated
May 1, 2026
File size
161.7 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.13.1
Languages
English
View full BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker report →

StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor

One Hundred Bad Ideas Limited
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 26, 2023
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
430.7 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
3.1.3
Languages
Arabic, English, German, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese +3 more
View full StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor report →

BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor? v
StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor earns about $171.4K per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $78.2K. That is a 2.2× revenue gap (~$93.2K more per month for StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $938.6K/year, StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor ≈ $2.06M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.7M estimated downloads vs 2.1M for StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor - a 2.3× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 43K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor's App Store downloads are estimated from 19K ratings.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range 7 tiers detected. StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor: IAP range 5 tiers detected. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.00/mo)" monetization model; StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor? v
StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 43K ratings, StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor 19K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $78.2K for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $171.4K for StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or StressWatch: AI Stress Monitor to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.