BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Sweat: Fitness App For Women
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 5.4M installs
VS
Sweat: Fitness App For Women
Sweat
Google Play
$437.3K/mo
~$5.25M/yr · 10.2M installs
Revenue winner
Sweat: Fitness App For Women wins
+43725100% vs other
Installs winner
Sweat: Fitness App For Women wins
+89% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+79% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+6% vs other
Why Sweat: Fitness App For Women is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Sweat: Fitness App For Women earns roughly 437251× more per month than BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - $437.3K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Sweat: Fitness App For Women runs a $11.56/mo subscription that compounds; BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Sweat: Fitness App For Women has ~10.2M lifetime installs vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's ~5.4M - 1.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Sweat: Fitness App For Women report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Sweat: Fitness App For Women
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$437.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$5.25M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.4M
▶
10.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
773K
App Store rating
4.66★
◀
4.38★
Total ratings
49K
◀
39K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$11.56
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 166.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 28, 2016
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.8
- Languages
- -
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Sweat: Fitness App For Women trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Sweat: Fitness App For Women? v
Sweat: Fitness App For Women earns about $437.3K per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$437.3K more per month for Sweat: Fitness App For Women). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $0/year, Sweat: Fitness App For Women ≈ $5.25M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Sweat: Fitness App For Women? v
Sweat: Fitness App For Women leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 5.4M for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - a 1.9× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Sweat: Fitness App For Women reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Sweat: Fitness App For Women in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Sweat: Fitness App For Women offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Sweat: Fitness App For Women: IAP range $0.99 - $134.99 per item. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Sweat: Fitness App For Women runs "Subscription (~$11.56/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Sweat: Fitness App For Women? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 49K ratings, Sweat: Fitness App For Women 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Sweat: Fitness App For Women revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $437.3K for Sweat: Fitness App For Women are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Sweat: Fitness App For Women to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.