Blitzer.de PRO vs Parkster - Smooth parking
Blitzer.de PRO
Eifrig Media GmbH
Google Play
$280.9K/mo
~$3.37M/yr · 2.5M installs
VS
Parkster - Smooth parking
Parkster
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 4.6M installs
Revenue winner
Blitzer.de PRO wins
+28086700% vs other
Installs winner
Parkster - Smooth parking wins
+87% vs other
MAU winner
Parkster - Smooth parking wins
+85% vs other
Rating winner
Blitzer.de PRO wins
+5% vs other
Why Blitzer.de PRO is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Blitzer.de PRO earns roughly 280867× more per month than Parkster - Smooth parking - $280.9K vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Blitzer.de PRO report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Blitzer.de PRO
vs
Parkster - Smooth parking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$280.9K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.37M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.5M
▶
4.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
220K
▶
405K
App Store rating
4.33★
◀
4.14★
Total ratings
64K
▶
127K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- USD9.49
- Released
- Oct 20, 2011
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.6.39
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Travel & Local
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 5, 2012
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.5.5
- Languages
- -
Blitzer.de PRO trajectory
Parkster - Smooth parking trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Blitzer.de PRO or Parkster - Smooth parking? v
Blitzer.de PRO earns about $280.9K per month, while Parkster - Smooth parking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$280.9K more per month for Blitzer.de PRO). Annual revenue: Blitzer.de PRO ≈ $3.37M/year, Parkster - Smooth parking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Blitzer.de PRO or Parkster - Smooth parking? v
Parkster - Smooth parking leads with about 4.6M estimated downloads vs 2.5M for Blitzer.de PRO - a 1.9× gap. Blitzer.de PRO reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Parkster - Smooth parking reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Blitzer.de PRO and Parkster - Smooth parking in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel & Local category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Blitzer.de PRO and Parkster - Smooth parking have in-app purchases? v
Blitzer.de PRO does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Parkster - Smooth parking does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Blitzer.de PRO runs "Paid app ($9.49)", Parkster - Smooth parking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Blitzer.de PRO or Parkster - Smooth parking? v
Blitzer.de PRO edges ahead with ★ 4.3 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Blitzer.de PRO 41 ratings, Parkster - Smooth parking 97 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Blitzer.de PRO vs Parkster - Smooth parking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $280.9K for Blitzer.de PRO and $0 for Parkster - Smooth parking are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel & Local) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Blitzer.de PRO or Parkster - Smooth parking to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.