Bloody Bastards vs Clay Jam Classic
Bloody Bastards
Tibith
Google Play
$184.2K/mo
~$2.21M/yr · 28.5M installs
VS
Clay Jam Classic
YumYumYukYuk
Google Play
$71/mo
~$854/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
Bloody Bastards wins
+259375% vs other
Installs winner
Bloody Bastards wins
+1438454% vs other
MAU winner
Bloody Bastards wins
+425088% vs other
Rating winner
Clay Jam Classic wins
+6% vs other
Why Bloody Bastards is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bloody Bastards earns roughly 2595× more per month than Clay Jam Classic - $184.2K vs $71.
- Bigger install base. Bloody Bastards has ~28.5M lifetime installs vs Clay Jam Classic's ~2K - 14385.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Bloody Bastards report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$184.2K
◀
$71
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.21M
◀
$854
Lifetime installs (est.)
28.5M
◀
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.7M
◀
402.752
App Store rating
4.67★
▶
4.95★
Total ratings
384K
◀
208
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Action
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 31, 2020
- Last updated
- Jan 17, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Mature 17+
- Version
- 4.2.6
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Action
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- Mar 27, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.4
- Languages
- -
Bloody Bastards trajectory
Clay Jam Classic trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Bloody Bastards or Clay Jam Classic? v
Bloody Bastards earns about $184.2K per month, while Clay Jam Classic earns about $71. That is a 2594.7× revenue gap (~$184.2K more per month for Bloody Bastards). Annual revenue: Bloody Bastards ≈ $2.21M/year, Clay Jam Classic ≈ $854/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Bloody Bastards or Clay Jam Classic? v
Bloody Bastards leads with about 28.5M estimated downloads vs 2K for Clay Jam Classic - a 14385.5× gap. Bloody Bastards reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Clay Jam Classic reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Bloody Bastards and Clay Jam Classic in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Action category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Bloody Bastards and Clay Jam Classic offer? v
Bloody Bastards: IAP range $3.99 per item. Clay Jam Classic: no IAP detected on the public listing. Bloody Bastards runs a "Free game · IAP-driven (0 packs, ~$0.30/MAU)" monetization model; Clay Jam Classic runs "Paid app ($2.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Bloody Bastards or Clay Jam Classic? v
Clay Jam Classic edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Bloody Bastards 10K ratings, Clay Jam Classic 47 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Bloody Bastards vs Clay Jam Classic revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $184.2K for Bloody Bastards and $71 for Clay Jam Classic are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Action) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Bloody Bastards or Clay Jam Classic to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
