Blue Iris vs Flud+

Blue Iris earns about $12.6K per month, while Flud+ earns about $8.6K. That is a 1.5× revenue gap (~$3.9K more per month for Blue Iris). Annual revenue: Blue Iris ≈ $151.0K/year, Flud+ ≈ $103.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Flud+ leads with about 181K estimated downloads vs 105K for Blue Iris - a 1.7× gap. Blue Iris reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. Flud+ reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Video Players & Editors category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Blue Iris does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Flud+ does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Blue Iris runs "Paid app ($9.99)", Flud+ runs "Paid app ($3.99)".

Flud+ edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 2.5 (gap of 2.2 stars). Rating volume: Blue Iris 1K ratings, Flud+ 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $12.6K for Blue Iris and $8.6K for Flud+ are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Video Players & Editors) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.