Bluesky Social vs QQ邮箱
Bluesky Social
Bluesky PBLLC
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.5M installs
VS
QQ邮箱
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$34.9K/yr · 36K installs
Revenue winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+291000% vs other
Installs winner
Bluesky Social wins
+3984% vs other
MAU winner
Bluesky Social wins
+6152% vs other
Rating winner
Bluesky Social wins
+10% vs other
Why QQ邮箱 is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- QQ邮箱 earns roughly 2910× more per month than Bluesky Social - $2.9K vs $0.
- Subscription model. QQ邮箱 runs a $8.99/mo subscription that compounds; Bluesky Social relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. QQ邮箱 runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Bluesky Social
vs
QQ邮箱
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$2.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$34.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.5M
◀
36K
Monthly active users (est.)?
626K
◀
10K
App Store rating
3.90★
◀
3.56★
Total ratings
14K
◀
728
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$8.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
7 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 18, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 82.9 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 1.126.0
- Languages
- AN, EU, KM, Catalan, Czech, Danish +32 more
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 173.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.6
- Languages
- English, Chinese, Chinese
Bluesky Social trajectory
QQ邮箱 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Bluesky Social or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K per month, while Bluesky Social earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2.9K more per month for QQ邮箱). Annual revenue: Bluesky Social ≈ $0/year, QQ邮箱 ≈ $34.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Bluesky Social or QQ邮箱? v
Bluesky Social leads with about 1.5M estimated downloads vs 36K for QQ邮箱 - a 40.8× gap. Bluesky Social's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 728 ratings.
Are Bluesky Social and QQ邮箱 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
No - Bluesky Social is in Social Networking and QQ邮箱 is in Productivity. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: Bluesky Social from social networking monetization patterns, QQ邮箱 from productivity.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Bluesky Social and QQ邮箱 offer? v
Bluesky Social: no IAP detected on the public listing. QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Bluesky Social runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; QQ邮箱 runs "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Bluesky Social or QQ邮箱? v
Bluesky Social edges ahead with ★ 3.9 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Bluesky Social 14K ratings, QQ邮箱 728 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Bluesky Social vs QQ邮箱 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Bluesky Social and $2.9K for QQ邮箱 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking / Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Bluesky Social or QQ邮箱 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.